Subspecies of
Common and Hoary Redpolls
by Ron Pittaway and
Jean Iron |
|
Revised January 2015, first
published in the journal Ontario Birds 10(3): 108-114,
Pittaway 1992. |
 |
|
|
Introduction |
The American Ornithologists' Union Check-list (1998) recognizes two
species of redpolls: Common Redpoll Acanthis flammea and
Hoary Redpoll A. hornemanni. Each species has two well-marked
subspecies in North America. The two subspecies of Common
Redpoll are the smaller southern nominate A. f. flammea and
the larger northern A. f. rostrata. The two subspecies of
Hoary Redpoll are the large northern nominate A. h. hornemanni
and the smaller southern A. h. exilipes.
Today, experienced observers can identify most redpolls to species
and many to subspecies with a high degree of certainty.
Take the Redpoll Challenge, which is to see all four
subspecies in one day. |
|
|
Plumages, Molts and Ageing |
Adult (definitive basic) redpolls undergo a complete molt of all
feathers once a year after the breeding season. Because buffy and
grayish feather edges gradually wear off, redpolls in fresh (new)
plumage in fall are paler than the same birds in worn (old) summer plumage. In males, the pink coloration is also paler when
fresh, gradually becoming richer and redder by spring. Feather wear
allows redpolls to don a breeding dress without the need to molt
(Newton 1972). This change is shown in the National Geographic
Society's Field Guide (Dunn and Alderfer 2011). Compare the
illustrations on page 525 of the bright breeding and duller winter
plumaged Common Redpolls.
Juveniles lack the red cap and black chin of older
birds. On the breeding grounds in late summer, juveniles (not seen
in southern Canada) undergo a
partial (body) molt to first year (formative) plumage retaining most
of the juvenile wing and tail feathers. Male and female first year
birds are darker and more streaked than respective adults. First
year birds normally cannot be sexed in the field. Redpolls
wear their first year plumage for approximately one year, after
which they have a complete molt into adult plumage. |
|
|
Four Redpoll Subspecies |
 |
Two Common Redpoll subspecies
(left) and two Hoary Redpoll subspecies. Drawing by Michel Gosselin of
the Canadian Museum of Nature. |
|
|
“Southern" Common Redpoll (A. f. flammea) |
This Low Arctic subspecies breeds south to northern Ontario (James
1991). It is an irregular winter visitor to southern Canada,
sometimes in large numbers. This is the commonest redpoll far
outnumbering the other three subspecies and is the standard by which
others are compared and recognized. Study the flocks, (bird feeders
are ideal), to learn the plumage variations. Adult males are richly
coloured with rosy pink. Adult females usually lack any pink
coloration. First year males and females are similar with some males
tinged with pink.
In all ages, the Southern Common Redpoll is streaked on the
sides, rump and undertail coverts and the bill is longer and less
stubby than in Hoary Redpoll. See six photos below. |
|
 |
 |
Adult male Southern flammea
in Toronto on 8 March
2011 |
Southern flammea In
Toronto on 8
March 2011 |
|
|
 |
 |
Southern Common Redpoll
(flammea) at Keswick on 5 January 2015. Buffy coloration
suggests a first year bird. |
Southern
Common Redpolls (flammea) eating weed seeds in early winter.
Pickering on 7 December 2007. |
|
|
 |
 |
Adult male Southern flammea in Toronto on
23 January 2013 |
Probable first year
male with a tinge of pink. Toronto on 15 December 2007 |
|
|
"Greater" Common Redpoll
(A.
f. rostrata) |
This large dark subspecies breeds on Baffin Island and
in Greenland
(Todd 1963). In parallel with the two subspecies of the Hoary
Redpoll, there is an apparent gap between the breeding ranges of the two
subspecies of Common Redpoll. It is a winter visitor "in small numbers to the southern parts
of the East from Ontario to Newfoundland" (Godfrey 1986). The late
Richard Poulin (pers. comm.) banded hundreds of redpolls near Ottawa,
Ontario,
and reported that Greaters were more frequent than Hoaries in some
winters. Look for this distinctive subspecies during redpoll
irruption years. Greaters are somewhat larger (averaging 14.0 cm)
than the "Southern" subspecies which averages 12.5 cm in length
(Newton 1972). The difference between the two subspecies is "fairly
obvious when the two birds are together in the same flock" (Peterson
1947). Field marks include its larger size and thicker bill, darker
and browner coloration than in
flammea, and
in adult males the red of underparts is less extensive and less intense.
Greaters are often described as being House Finch-like. |
|
 |
 |
Greater Common Redpoll (rostrata)
in Toronto 8 March 2011. Note extensive black on face and chin. |
Three Greater Redpolls
(rostrata) in Toronto on 8 March 2011. |
|
|
 |
 |
Adult male Greater
Common Redpoll (rostrata) in Norland on
3 January 2008. |
Greater (rostrata) in Toronto on 8 March 2011. More extensive
black on face and chin, darker overall, browner, more coarsely
streaked, with darker face and a longer tail than in Southern Common
flammea. |
|
|
 |
 |
Greater Redpoll (rostrata) in Toronto on 20 March 2011. More
extensive black on face and chin, darker and browner overall, more
coarsely streaked, and with a longer tail than in Southern flammea. |
Juvenile (back) and probable female Greater (rostrata) in
Greenland on 6 September 2013. Streaked juvenile lacks red cap and black chin.
Note: redpolls in juvenile plumage of all four subspecies are
not seen in southern Canada and contiguous United States. |
|
|
 |
 |
Greater Redpoll (rostrata)
in Greenland on 6 September 2013 |
Greater Redpoll (rostrata) in
Greenland on 6 September 2013 |
|
|
|
|
"Southern" Hoary Redpoll
(A. h.
exilipes) |
This subspecies breeds in the
Low Arctic and its range
overlaps with the "Southern" Common Redpoll. It breeds south to the tundra coast of
Hudson Bay in Ontario (Leckie and Pittaway in
Cadman et al 2007). During redpoll flight years, it is usually
possible to find a few classic adult males. They stand out by their
very white frosted appearance, pure white rumps, paler and less
extensive pink suffusion on the breast, more lightly streaked
flanks, and very lightly streaked to immaculate undertail coverts.
Southern Hoaries are similar in size to southern Commons, but
usually have shorter, more obtuse (stubby) bills imparting a
distinctive "pushed in face" appearance. Some first year and adult female Southern Hoaries can be quite streaked on the rump and
sides (Knox 1988). Beware of size illusions that can lead
to Southern Hoaries being misidentfied as Hornemann's. White birds
often loom bigger than same-sized dark birds and a fluffed
exilipes can appear huge. In photos, the distance and angle
affect size perception. |
|
 |
 |
Southern Hoary Redpolls (exilipes) are paler overall caused by whiter feather
edgings so that Hoaries look like Common Redpolls seen
through a white veil (Taverner 1934). Norland, Ontario, on 3
January 2008. |
Hoary (exilipes) features are a white rump,
white undertail coverts limited to a few streaks and more obtuse
bill. Its fluffed appearance could lead to a misidentification of
hornemanni. Norland, Ontario, on 3 January 2008. |
|
|
 |
 |
Southern Hoary Redpoll in
Toronto on 29 January 2013. |
Southern Hoary Redpoll showing
white rump in Toronto on 8 March
2011. |
|
|
 |
 |
Southern Hoary Redpoll. Buff suffusion on face suggests a first year bird. Norland,
Ontario, on 3 January 2008. |
Southern Hoary
Redpoll with Southern Common Redpoll in background. Note Hoary`s tiny bill. Keswick,
Ontario, on 5
January 2015 |
|
|
|
"Hornemann's" Hoary Redpoll
(C.
h. hornemanni) |
The "Hornemann's"
Hoary Redpoll is the largest and palest of the redpolls (Godfrey
1986). There is apparently a gap between the breeding ranges of the
two subspecies of the Hoary Redpoll (Todd 1963). Hornemann's breeds in the Canadian
High Arctic and Greenland and
was until recently considered a great rarity south of the
tundra.
The AOU Check-list (1957) lists a record from Galt (Cambridge),
Ontario. The specimen is in the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto. The Ontario Bird Records Committee has accepted
10 recent
records to date (August 2015) and we know of at least as many that have not been reviewed
by the OBRC. For status in Ontario, James (1991) states "During
winter very light and larger birds (hornemanni-like) occur in
small numbers." Hornemann's is larger (averaging 14.0 cm) than the
"Southern" Hoary which averages 12.5 cm in length (Newton 1972).
Todd (1963) reports "no overlap in measurements" between the two
Hoary subspecies. Compared to the Southern Hoary Redpoll, Hornemann's is known by its larger size, overall whiter appearance,
less prominent streaking on the sides, and immaculate undertail coverts; males have less pink which is of a different hue,
some showing a mere trace of pink suffusion on the breast (Todd
1963). Michel Gosselin of the Canadian Museum of Nature cautions that the most reliable way to identify Hornemann's Redpoll
is by its larger size in direct comparison with other redpolls. See
photos below. |
|
|
 |
 |
Click on photo for larger image. Male
Hornemann's Hoary Redpoll is larger compared to Common Redpoll.
Roxane Filion took this photo at her feeders in South Porcupine
(Cochrane District), Ontario, when the Hornemann's returned on 7
February 2015. |
Click on photo for larger image. Male
Hornemann's Hoary Redpoll showing larger size compared to two Common
Redpolls. Roxane Filion took this photo at her feeders in South
Porcupine (Cochrane District), Ontario, on 3 February 2015. |
|
|
 |
 |
Click on photo for larger image. Adult male Hornemann's Hoary Redpoll
(right) in Township of
North Frontenac on 28 February 2011. Note larger size compared to
a Southern Common Redpoll (flammea). Photo by Amy Kay. |
Click on photo for larger image. Hornemann's Hoary
Redpoll at our feeders in Toronto on 12 March 2011. Aged and sexed
as a probable first year female in formative plumage by the
prominent streaking on its sides. Note its heavily feathered
leggings. |
|
|
 |
 |
Click on photo for larger image. Hornemann's Hoary
Redpoll at our bird feeder in Toronto on 23 March 2011. Note larger
size compared to Common Redpolls. |
Click on photo for larger image. Hornemann's Hoary Redpoll at Marathon,
Ontario, on 9 November 2012. Note larger size. Photo by Michael Butler. |
|
|
Juvenile Hornemann's Hoary
Redpoll |
Leucistic (partial albino)
Redpolls |
 |
 |
This may be the first photo ever
published of a juvenile Hornemann's Hoary Redpoll. Pond Inlet, North
Baffin Island, Nunavut, Canada on 30 August 2015. It was a great
thrill to see this most northerly and largest of the redpolls on its
breeding grounds. Photo by Ian Scriver. |
Leucistic (partial albino) Common
Redpolls can occur in any large flock of redpolls, especially during
a flight year. They may easily be misidentified as a Hoary. Matt
Walter took this photo of a leucistic Common Redpoll at North Bay on
1 April 2013, |
|
Redpoll
Variation |
A large flock of Southern Common Redpolls (flammea)
will show four plumage classes due to age and sex differences: adult males, adult
females, first year males, and first year females. Add another
subspecies to the flock and now there are eight possible
plumage types. Age and sex plus individual variation account for much of
the difficulty in distinguishing Common and Hoary Redpolls and their
subspecies.
Hybridization is apparently rare.
Much of
the confusion over
intermediate birds can be explained by age and sex differences, and
individual variation (Knox 1988, Pyle 1997). Individuals showing confusing characters are best left
unidentified. |
|
Acknowledgements |
We thank Angus Baptiste, Bill Crins, Bob Curry, Bruce Di Labio, Earl
Godfrey, Michel Gosselin, Brian Henshaw, Christine Kerrigan, Ian
Newton, Henri Ouellet, Mark Peck, Richard Poulin, Ron Tozer, Declan Troy and
Mike Turner for much valuable assistance. We are particularly
grateful to Michel Gosselin and Declan Troy for their insightful
discussions on redpoll identification and taxonomy, |
|
Literature Cited |
American Ornithologists' Union.
1957.
Check-list of North
American Birds, 5th edition. American Ornithologists' Union,
Washington, D.C.
American Ornithologists' Union.
1998.
Check-list of North
American Birds, 7th edition. Allen Press Inc., Kansas.
Cadman,
M. D., D. A Sutherland, G. G. Beck, D. Lepage, A. R. Couturier
(editors).
2007. Atlas
of the Breeding Birds of Ontario published by Bird Studies Canada,
Environment Canada, Ontario Field Ornithologists, Ontario Ministry
of Natural Resources, Ontario Nature.
Dunn
J. L. and J. Alderfer. 2011. Field Guide to the Birds of North America.
National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
Godfrey, W. E. 1986. The Birds of
Canada. Second Edition. National Museum of Canada, Ottawa.
James, R. D. 1991. Annotated Checklist of the Birds of Ontario.
Second Edition. Life Sciences Miscellaneous Publications, Royal
Ontario Museum, Toronto.
Knox, A. G.
1988. The taxonomy of redpolls. Ardea 76: 1-26.
Newton, I.
1972. Finches. Collins, London.
Peterson, R. T.
1947. A Field Guide to the Birds. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
Pittaway, R.
1992. Recognizable Forms: Redpolls. Ontario Birds 10(3):108-114.
Pyle, P. 1997.
Identification Guide to North American Birds. Part 1. Slate Creek
Press, Bolinas, California.
Taverner, P. A. 1934.
Birds of Canada. National Museum of Canada.
Todd, W. E. C. 1963. Birds of the
Labrador Peninsula and Adjacent Areas. Carnegie Museum and
University of Toronto Press.
|
|
|
|